?
To Peirce Hintikka’s Thoughts
Logica Universalis. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 241-262.
This paper compares Peirce’s and Hintikka’s logical philosophies and identifies a cross-section of similarities in their thoughts in the areas of action-first epistemology, pragmaticist meaning, philosophy of science, and philosophy of logic and mathematics
Publication based on the results of:
Zharkaya V., Lukhovitskiy L., Byzantinische Zeitschrift 2020 Vol. 113 No. 1 P. 219-248
The article brings under scrutiny an understudied dialogical account about the deposition of the patriarch of Constantinople Nicholas IV Mouzalon (1147–51). A close reading shows that this is not an official record of the proceedings but a piece of fiction that deliberately inverts the generic conventions of the two types of texts indicative of the ...
Added: October 31, 2019
Pietarinen A., Chiffi D., Contemporary Pragmatism 2020 Vol. 17 No. 2-3 P. 205-227
Arguments from knowability have largely been concerned with cases for and against realism, or truth as an epistemic vs. non-epistemic concept. This article proposes bringing Peirce’s pragmaticism, called here ‘action-first’ epistemology, to bear on the issue. It is shown that a notion weaker than knowability, namely conjecturability, is epistemologically a better-suited notion to describe an essential ...
Added: August 28, 2020
Girinsky A., Lepetiukhina A., Pashchenko T., Мир психологии. Научно-методический журнал 2023 Т. 114 № 3 С. 286-300
The article raises the problem of the historical and philosophical formation of skills and attitudes, which today are the essential components of critical thinking. Through the selection of the semantic core of critical thinking (discipline and impartiality of thinking, the culture of working with sources, the ability to use the methods of rational knowledge in ...
Added: November 9, 2023
Bobrova A., Pietarinen A., Pragmatics and Cognition 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1 P. 111-134
Mercier and Sperber (MS) have ventured to undermine an age-old assumption in logic, namely the presence of premise-conclusion structures, in favor of two novel claims: that reasoning is an evolutionary product of a reason-intuiting module in the mind, and that theories of logic teach next to nothing about the mechanisms of how inferences are drawn ...
Added: October 31, 2022
Pietarinen A., Cognitive Semiotics 2021 Vol. 14 No. 1 P. 29-46
Pragmaticism states that general rules of action, or habits, are generalizing tendencies that lead us to action in conceivable situations describable in general terms. As a method of ‘putting questions to our minds,’ it assigns meanings to signs in terms of conceivable practical consequences for rational conduct. Questions are experiments on various ways of finding ...
Added: August 26, 2023
Pavlova A., Logical Investigations 2019 Vol. 25 No. 2 P. 75-93
In the present paper we introduce a variation of Giles’s game that captures the semantics of Slaney and Meyer’s Abelian logic. This is a variation of the game earlier proposed for the Lukasiewicz infinitely-valued logic. We discuss two possible interpretations of this game. One of the interpretations involves a reference to different types of agents. We also give a ...
Added: September 20, 2019