?
Керенский как фантом русских революций 1917 года. Глазами русских поэтов и писателей
Вопросы литературы. 2018. № май-июнь. С. 170-198.
-
Publication based on the results of:
Lekmanov O., Новый мир 2021 № 8 С. 176-179
Analysis of Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve" ...
Added: August 2, 2021
Dmitriev T., Социологическое обозрение 2017 Т. 16 № 3 С. 87-110
Max Weber was one of the first social scientists to give a critical analysis of the socialist experiment in Russia from 1917 to 1920. The fundamental importance of this segment of Weber’s heritage today is that Weber makes his interpretation of the 1917 Russian Revolution not only from a practical-polemical standpoint, but also from a ...
Added: February 25, 2018
Kantor V., Вопросы философии 2017 № 11 С. 100-104
Added: September 14, 2017
Kantor V., Studi Slavistici 2017 № XIV С. 331-350
In his article, Vladimir Kantor examines the mental causes of the Russian revolution of 1917. He analyses, as a matter of fact, the pan-European problem – the darkening of the Christian mind, and how, during social upheavals, elements that despise the mind awake and universal madness is born. The author shows how suicidal moods awake ...
Added: December 11, 2017
Бросова Н. З., Белгород : ИД "Белгород", НИУ "БелГУ", 2017
...
Added: May 10, 2017
Kantor V., Социологическое обозрение 2018 Т. 17 № 2 С. 223-225
Added: July 2, 2018
Luks L., Социологическое обозрение 2018 Т. 17 № 2 С. 284-298
Fedor Stepun was a kind of a bridge between the German and Russian cultures. Stepun’s cooperation with the Catholic magazine “Hochland”, in which he published a number of articles after his expulsion from Soviet Russia in 1922, played a special role in this regard. The first section of the essay includes the analysis of the ...
Added: July 2, 2018
Luks L., Форум новейшей восточноевропейской истории и культуры 2017 № 2 С. 95-116
Added: November 5, 2018
Rutkevich A. M., Studies in East European Thought 2017 Vol. 69 No. 4 P. 329-344
History begins in a struggle producing two figures, Master and Slave. It ends in a “universal and homogeneous state”, an Empire. Revolution with its inevitable terror is the central point in this history. Kojève himself had experienced the Russian revolution and Civil War; in 1920 he left Russia for Germany, where till the end of ...
Added: November 27, 2017
Dmitriev T., Studies in East European Thought 2017 Vol. 69 No. 4 P. 305-328
The author conducts a comparative analysis of the Russian Revolution developed by two prominent social-political thinkers of Germany and Russia in the early twentieth century—Max Weber and Peter Struve. The article focuses on their respective interpretations of the causes, course, and consequences of the Revolution as determined by their political ideals, i.e. a specific combination ...
Added: February 25, 2018
Besschetnova E., Социологическое обозрение 2018 Т. 17 № 2 С. 299-316
The Russian empire was based on strength, and the survival of any of the state’s institutions was possible only if the country was protected by a powerful and efficient army. In order for the army to exist as a force, it needed iron discipline and a one-man management. In other words, as the support of ...
Added: July 2, 2018
Besschetnova E., Kantor V., Zeitschrift fur Slawistik 2018 Vol. 63 No. 1 P. 175-182
2017 is the year of the one hundredth jubilee of the most important social and political event in European history and Russian history, namely the revolution of 1917. In the course of this jubilee year the International Laboratory for the study of Russian and European intellectual dialogue of the National Research University Higher School of ...
Added: December 15, 2017
Luks L., Форум новейшей восточноевропейской истории и культуры 2017 № 2 С. 5-8
Added: March 20, 2018
Zhukova O., Вопросы философии 2017 № 11 С. 104-107
In the O. A. Zhukova’s article Evgeny Trubetskoy as a Philosopher of History: on the Meaning of Russian Revolution is shown that Evgeny Trubetskoy raised the question about the meaning of war and the causes of the Russian revolution, continuing the line of reasoning about the specifics of the national history and the spiritual crisis of the Christian ...
Added: September 14, 2017
Besschetnova E., Zhukova O., Kantor V. et al., Вопросы философии 2017 № 11 С. 95-133
Added: September 14, 2017
Kara-Murza A., Социологическое обозрение 2018 Т. 17 № 2 С. 262-283
This article is devoted to the analysis of the distinctive “sociology of Moscow” of the Russian philosopher and sociologist Fyodor Avgustovich Stepun (1884–1965) who was born, studied, and lived in Moscow until his expulsion in 1922 by the Bolshevik regime of Soviet Russia. From a large amount of factual material, the author shows how the ...
Added: July 2, 2018
Kara-Murza A., Вопросы философии 2017 № 11 С. 112-115
...
Added: September 14, 2017
Kiseleva M., Форум новейшей восточноевропейской истории и культуры 2017 № 2 С. 57-72
«Русская весна» 1917 г. принесла в страну революцию. И это – не поэтическая метафора. Кто-то может увидеть своего рода моду в таком эпитете, если вспом- нит «Пражскую весну» 1968 г. или даже современные события на арабском Во- стоке, которые журналисты любят называть «арабской весной». Однако тексты времени первой русской революции столетней давности обнаруживают, что со- ...
Added: March 20, 2018
Milan : Vita e Pensiero, 2018
Added: February 20, 2019
Braginskaya N., Костенко Н., Вопросы литературы 2017 № 5 С. 9-20
In the Foreword to the publication of excerpts from the Freienberg's Memoirs on Russian Revolution the author quotes letters written by Olga Freidenberg in 1917-1918. And makes a comparison of the three points on the chronological axis: the letters are from 1917-1918 and memoirs from 1937 and 1947 The comparison provides a picture of rethinking ...
Added: October 17, 2017
Liubimov S., Форум новейшей восточноевропейской истории и культуры 2018 № 1
Революции 1917 года в России стали поворотным моментом в истории не только российской, но и мировой. В результате двух государственных переворотов – первого, приведшего к гибели самодержавия в России, и второго, связанного с утратой политического плюрализма и падением Временного правительства, – к власти пришли большевики во главе с В.И. Лениным. Русские интеллектуалы не остались безучастными ...
Added: February 13, 2018
Kantor V., , in : La Russia e l’Occidente. Dinamiche politiche a cento anni dalla Rivoluzione d’Ottobre. : Milan : Vita e Pensiero, 2018. P. 49-59.
Added: February 20, 2019
Kamenskikh A. A., Довгополова О. А., В кн. : Гуманитарная наука в России и перелом 1917 года: экзистенциальное измерение. : СПб. : Алетейя, 2017. Гл. 1. С. 5-8.
Когда мы задумываемся о событиях, изменивших судьбы целых государств, нам легко оперировать «большими величинами». Неуди- вительно – ведь кажется, что нигде воля огромных масс людей не становится столь очевидной, чем в описании революций, завоевательных войн, социальных потрясений. Четкие очертания приобретают как волевые усилия побеждающего сообщества, так и катастрофическое разрушение мира тех, кто не смог вписаться ...
Added: October 18, 2017
Saburova T., Eklof B., Slavic Review 2017 Vol. 76 No. 3 P. 683-693
Nikolai Charushin and Vera Figner, both populists of the “1870s generation,” late in their lives played a role in the events of 1917, responding first with tempered enthusiasm, and then with trepidation over the growing chaos and polarization that led up to the Bolshevik revolution in October. Highly active in the events of that year, ...
Added: October 22, 2017